
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Laparoscopic Cholecystostomy in Pigs: Technique and Comparison with Traditional Open Cholecystostomy for Surgical Stress
Zhang H., Tong J., Zhang S., Zhang...
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Read
ABSTRACT
This article describes a simple technique of laparoscopic cholecystostomy (LC) and compares the LC technique with open cholecystostomy (OC) for clinical outcome and surgical stress response. LC was performed under general anesthesia using three portals. The gallbladder was fixed to the anterior abdominal wall using two sets of simple interrupted sutures placed between the anterior abdominal wall and gallbladder, rather than the traditional single set. A cauterized incision was made at the gallbladder fundus such that it lay at the center of a purse-string suture; an 18-F Malecot catheter was introduced into the gallbladder lumen through this incision. The mean duration required for completing LC was 38±12 min, which was decreased by 16 min with increasing experience. In a matched group of pigs, OC was performed using the conventional approach. All animals underwent tube cholecystocholangiography and follow-up laparoscopy at 15 days and 1 month after the surgery, respectively. The investigations showed that the gallbladder was viable with no bile leakage or abscess formation and that it remained adherent to the abdominal wall. In addition, the serum concentrations of cortisol, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein showed that the surgical stress response was lower for LC than OC. Thus, in terms of surgical stress, and possibly operative time, laparoscopic placement of the Malecot catheter using a three-portal approach and two suture anchors may be more beneficial than OC for the creation of a short-term access route into the gallbladder and bile ducts in pigs, under both interventional and experimental settings.
[...]
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
About
Affiliation of the authors at the time of publication
1College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
2Animal Science and Technology College, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing, China.
Copyright Statement
© All text and images in this publication are copyright protected and cannot be reproduced or copied in any way.Related Content
Readers also viewed these publications
No related publications found.
Subscribe
The Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine is available as an open, online journal for veterinarians worldwide.

Comments (0)
Ask the author
0 comments