Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Morphometry as an assessment tool for overweight/obesity in Raza Chilena stallions
Werner Becker, Marianne; Bustamante...
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Read
Introduction
Obesity/overweight is an abnormal/excessive fat accumulation representing a health risk that affects humans and domestic animals. In horses and ponies prevalence ranges from 23-70%, and up to 79.6% in Raza Chilena horses (Wyse et al 2008; Robin et al 2015; Jensen et al 2016; Potter et al 2016). The aim of this study was to determine the effect of overweight/obesity over some morphologic parameters in Raza Chilena stallions.
Materials and Methods
Twenty-nine Raza Chilena stallions (5-21 years), weighting 404±14,01kg, and mean height (H) of 139,8±1,3cm, were included. Body condition score (BCS, Henneke et al 1983), cresty neck score (CNS, Carter et al 2009), body and neck measurements were obtained, and some ratios were calculated. Stallions were allocated into three groups: Control (C): BCS7 (n=12), Equine Metabolic Syndrome (EMS) positive glucose test (n=9).
Results
Abdominal perimeter (AP) was larger in EMS and O groups compared to C and medium neck circumference (MNC) was larger in EMS stallions (p<0.05). Neck crest was higher in O and EMS stallions compared to C (p<0,05). AP:H ratio was higher in EMS and O stallions compared to C. MNC:neck length and MNC:H ratios were larger in EMS stallions compared to O and C groups. C stallions showed lower values of Girth:H ratio compared to O and EMS. CNS was 2,86, 3,08 and 3,26 for C, EMS, and O groups, respectively
Discussion/Conclusions
Easier methods to identify horses at obesity risk and metabolic problems could improve health/welfare. EMS status had an effect over AP, therefore could be a useful measurement to obtain, like MNC. G:H ratio >1,21 could indicate overweight/obesity (Jensen et al 2016), observed in this study. AP:H could be an adequate ratio to assess adiposity in stallions (Carter et al 2009).
References
Acknowledgement to Morris Animal Foundation funding (D20EQ-801).
References
- Carter RA, Geor RJ, Burton Staniar W, Cubitt TA, Harris PA. 2009. Apparent adiposity assessed by standardized scoring systems and morphometric measurements in horses and ponies. Vet J. 179, 204-210.
- Jensen R, Danielsen S, Tauson A. 2016. Body condition score, morphometric measurements, and estimation of body weight in mature Icelandic horses in Denmark. Acta Vet Scand 58, 59. DOI: 10.1186/s13028-016-0240-5.
- Potter S., Bamford N., Harris P., Bailey S. 2016. Prevalence of obesity and owners´ perception of body condition in pleasure horses and ponies in south-eastern Australia. Aust Vet J 94, 427-432.
- Robin C, Ireland J, Wylie C, Collins S, Verheyen K y col. 2015. Prevalence of and risk factors for equine obesity in Great Britain based on owner-reported body condition scores. Equine Vet J 47, 196-201.
- Wyse C, McNie K, Tannahil V, Murray J, Love S. 2008. Prevalence of obesity in riding horses in Scotland. Vet Rec 162, 590-591.
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
About
Affiliation of the authors at the time of publication
1UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE, Instituto de Ciencia Animal, Valdivia, Chile ; 2Universidad Austral de Chile, Instituto de Ciencias Clínicas Veterinarias, Valdivia, Chile
Comments (0)
Ask the author
0 comments