Skip to main content
menu sluit menu
Home Home
Login
Main navigation
  • Library
  • Calendar
  • e-Learning
  • News
    • Veterinary News In this section you find veterinary news
    • Recent Additions All content that was recently added to the IVIS library
  • Get involved
    • Donate Support IVIS, make a donation today
    • Media kit Promote your e-learning & events on IVIS
    • Add your e-learning & events to the IVIS calendar
    • Publish on IVIS Publish your work with us
  • About
    • Mission Our Mission Statement
    • What we do More info about IVIS and what we do
    • Who we are More info about the IVIS team
    • Authors See list of all IVIS authors and editors
  • Contact
User tools menu
User tools menu
Main navigation
  • Library
  • Calendar
  • e-Learning
  • News
    • Veterinary News In this section you find veterinary news
    • Recent Additions All content that was recently added to the IVIS library
  • Get involved
    • Donate Support IVIS, make a donation today
    • Media kit Promote your e-learning & events on IVIS
    • Add your e-learning & events to the IVIS calendar
    • Publish on IVIS Publish your work with us
  • About
    • Mission Our Mission Statement
    • What we do More info about IVIS and what we do
    • Who we are More info about the IVIS team
    • Authors See list of all IVIS authors and editors
  • Contact
Follow IVIS
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Support IVIS

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Library
  3. Veterinary Evidence
  4. Veterinary Evidence - Vol 7 N°4, Oct-Dec 2022
  5. Do inhaled or oral glucocorticoids more effectively control feline asthma?
CoverVetEvidence Vol 7 No 4
Back to Table of Contents
Add to My Library
Close
Would you like to add this to your library?

Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website

  • Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
  • Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
  • Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
  • Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
  • Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Sign in Register
Comments
Share:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail
  • Twitter

Do inhaled or oral glucocorticoids more effectively control feline asthma?

Author(s):

Williams S.C.

In: Veterinary Evidence - Vol 7 N°4, Oct-Dec 2022 by Veterinary Evidence
Updated:
DEC 12, 2022
Languages:
  • EN
Back to Table of Contents
Add to My Library
Close
Would you like to add this to your library?

Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website

  • Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
  • Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
  • Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
  • Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
  • Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Sign in Register
SHARE:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail
  • Twitter
    Read

    PICO question

    In cats with chronic bronchospasm and airway hypersensitivity (asthma) do oral glucocorticoids or inhaled glucocorticoids more effectively control the clinical signs?

    Clinical bottom line

    Category of research question

    Treatment.

    The number and type of study designs reviewed

    Three prospective randomised clinical trials were appraised. Two of the studies followed a crossover design and had a control group, whilst the third study described an interrupted time series.

    Strength of evidence

    Weak.

    Outcomes reported

    The available studies deemed a reduction in eosinophilia on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid analysis, and a reduction in airway resistance as markers of treatment efficacy.

    Conclusion

    There is weak evidence to suggest equal treatment efficacy of oral and inhaled glucocorticoid therapy for management of feline asthma. Higher powered studies would be required before a definitive recommendation can be made.

    How to apply this evidence in practice

    The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.

    Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.

    [...]

    Appraisal, application and reflection

    All three studies used a reduction in airway resistance and reduction in airway eosinophilia as measures of treatment success (Verschoor-Kirss et al. 2021; Leemans et al. 2012; and Reinero et al. 2005).

    Pulmonary function testing of asthmatic cats offers a non-invasive means of assessing response to therapy, and in the study by (Leemans et al. 2012) barometric whole-body plethysmography was used in unrestrained conscious cats to assess changes in airway resistance. In contrast, Reinero et al. (2005) and Verschoor-Kirss (2021), anaesthetised cats before airway challenge commenced and the airway’s response was assessed. Leemans et al. (2012) and Reinero et al. (2005) did not find a significant difference in the reduction of airway resistance among treatment groups. Meanwhile Verschoor-Kirss (2021) found that there was a greater reduction in airway resistance with oral glucocorticoid treatment compared to baseline than with inhaled therapy. Although this study does highlight that cats in the inhaled treatment group started with higher baseline resistance than those in the oral group.

    Regardless of the study design all studies found that when an oral or inhaled therapy was used, treatment resulted in a reduction in airway eosinophilia. However, only Leemans et al. (2012) found the decrease in BAL fluid eosinophil percentage to be more significant with oral therapy compared to inhaled therapy alone. Interestingly, when salbutamol was used concurrently with the inhaled therapy in this study, they found a significant decrease in BAL fluid eosinophil percentage also (Leemans et al. 2012).

    An additional method that was used to evaluate treatment response in the asthmatic cat cohorts, was the change in radiographic appearance of the lungs (determined by a clinical score). Verschoor-Kirss (2021) and Leemans et al. (2012) used changes in the radiographic appearance of the lung as a study outcome. Thoracic radiographs were assessed before and after treatment administration and assigned a score. However, no significant difference was detected between scores before or after oral or inhaled treatment in either study.

    Two of the three papers chose to assess fluticasone propionate as the inhaled glucocorticoid and prednisolone as the oral glucocorticoid (Verschoor-Kirss et al. 2021; and Leemans et al. 2012) whilst Reinero et al. (2005) assessed flunisolide and prednisone. Despite two of the studies using the same medications, they were not cross comparable as the doses of the drugs, and length of time for which cats received the oral and / or inhaled glucocorticoid treatment varied greatly. Treatment duration varied from 4 days (Leemans et al. 2012) to 8 weeks (Verschoor-Kirss et al. 2021). Future studies could consider using varying concentrations of each treatment on the same study population to determine the minimum effective dose to control clinical signs associated with asthma.

    Verschoor-Kirss et al. (2021) was the only study that assessed a population of naturally asthmatic cats. Clinically their response to treatment is more likely to reflect that of owned asthmatic cats. The treatment protocol in this study differed from the other studies; oral glucocorticoid treatment was given concurrently with the inhalant therapy for 1 week before inhalant therapy was continued exclusively. Whilst this makes it more difficult to determine the efficacy of fluticasone as a sole therapy, this treatment protocol is more likely to be reflective of a feline asthma treatment protocol prescribed in general practice.

    All the clinical studies had low numbers of feline participants and study duration was short. The small cohort numbers reduce the statistical power of each paper’s results and consequently make it difficult to draw confident conclusions. Power analysis would be beneficial before performing further prospective, randomised, blinded studies.

    Overall, there is a weak pool of evidence available to determine if oral or inhaled glucocorticoid treatment is more effective at managing the airway inflammation associated with feline asthma.

    […]

    View full text
    Back to Table of Contents
    Add to My Library
    Close
    Would you like to add this to your library?

    Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website

    • Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
    • Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
    • Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
    • Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
    • Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
    Sign in Register
    Comments (0)

    Ask the author

    0 comments
    Submit
    Close
    Would to like to further discuss this item?

    Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website

    • Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
    • Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
    • Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
    • Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
    • Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
    Sign in Register
    About

    Copyright Statement

    © All text and images in this publication are copyright protected and cannot be reproduced or copied in any way.
    Related Content

    Readers also viewed these publications

    • Proceeding

      LAVC - Annual Conference - Lima, 2022

      By: Latin American Veterinary Conference
      MAR 18, 2023
    • Journal Issue

      Cirugía de urgencias - Argos N°246, Marzo 2023

      In: Argos
      MAR 10, 2023
    • Proceeding

      AVEF - Conférence Annuelle - Reims, 2022

      By: Association des Vétérinaires Équins Français
      MAR 03, 2023
    • Proceeding

      LAVC - Annual Conference - Lima, 2021

      By: Latin American Veterinary Conference
      FEB 19, 2023
    • Journal Issue

      Veterinary Evidence - Vol 7 N°4, Oct-Dec 2022

      In: Veterinary Evidence
      FEB 05, 2023
    • Journal Issue

      Patología cardiaca - Argos N°245, Enero/Febrero 2023

      In: Argos
      JAN 30, 2023
    • Proceeding

      SFT - Theriogenology Annual Conference - Bellevue, 2022

      By: Society for Theriogenology
      JAN 10, 2023
    • Journal Issue

      Urgencias y cuidados intensivos - Argos N°244, Diciembre 2022

      In: Argos
      DEC 31, 2022
    • Proceeding

      ISCFR-EVSSAR Symposium - Italy 2022

      By: International Symposium on Canine and Feline Reproduction
      DEC 02, 2022
    • Journal Issue

      Patología endocrina - Argos N°243, Noviembre 2022

      In: Argos
      NOV 27, 2022
    • Proceeding

      ACVIM & ECEIM - Consensus Statements

      By: American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine
      NOV 11, 2022
    • Journal Issue

      Traumatología y neurología - Argos Nº242, Octubre 2022

      In: Argos
      NOV 10, 2022
    • Chapter

      Tibia and Tarsus

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      NOV 07, 2022
    • Chapter

      Femur and Stifle Joint

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      OCT 28, 2022
    • Journal Issue

      Medicina felina - Argos Nº241, Septiembre 2022

      In: Argos
      OCT 24, 2022
    • Chapter

      Sacroiliac Joint, Pelvis, and Hip Joint

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      OCT 17, 2022
    • Journal Issue

      Veterinary Evidence - Vol 7 N°2, Apr-Jun 2022

      In: Veterinary Evidence
      OCT 07, 2022
    • Chapter

      Amputation of the Forelimb

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      OCT 02, 2022
    • Journal Issue

      Dirofilariosis Felina: abordaje clínico y situación actual en España - Argos Nº241 Supl., Septiembre 2022

      In: Argos
      SEP 30, 2022
    • Chapter

      Carpus, Metacarpus, and Phalanges

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      SEP 26, 2022
    • Chapter

      Radius and Ulna

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      SEP 16, 2022
    • Chapter

      Humerus and Elbow Joint

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      SEP 10, 2022
    • Chapter

      Scapula and Shoulder Joint

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      SEP 05, 2022
    • Chapter

      Bone Grafts and Implants

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      SEP 03, 2022
    • Chapter

      External Skeletal Fixation

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      AUG 28, 2022
    • Load more
    Subscribe

    Veterinary Evidence is an online, open access, peer-reviewed journal owned and published by RCVS Knowledge.  If you would like to receive updates on recent publications, you can register here.  If you would like to submit an manuscript for publication in the Veterinary Evidence journal, you can consult the Guidelines for Authors.

     

    Subscribe today
    Back To Top
    Become a member of IVIS and get access to all our resources
    Create an account
    Sign in
    Leading the way in providing veterinary information
    About IVIS
    • Mission
    • What we do
    • Who we are
    Need help?
    • Contact
    Follow IVIS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    International Veterinary Information Service (IVIS) is a not-for-profit organization established to provide information to veterinarians, veterinary students, technicians and animal health professionals worldwide using Internet technology.
    Support IVIS
    © 2023 International Veterinary Information Service
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy