Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
In cats and dogs with traumatic diaphragmatic rupture, does surgical timing affect outcome?
Alison Robertson
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Read
PICO question
In cats and dogs with traumatic diaphragmatic rupture undergoing herniorrhaphy does surgical timing affect outcome?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research question
Prognosis
The number and type of study designs reviewed
Ten studies were critically appraised. All of these were retrospective case series
Strength of evidence
Zero
Outcomes reported
Overall, there is not sufficient evidence reporting if timing of surgical intervention has an effect on the mortality rate in dogs and cats with traumatic diaphragmatic rupture. Mortality rate was 6.8–50% in all cases
Conclusion
There is no statistically significant information available with only several retrospective studies published that are a low quality of evidence. Clinical practice can be reviewed based upon current evidence assessing timing of herniorrhaphy of traumatic diaphragmatic rupture. However, there are no clear recommendations and future studies are warranted
How to apply this evidence in practice
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
[...]
Appraisal, application and reflection
Overall, there is low quality of evidence assessing if performing herniorrhaphy within 24 hours of presentation affects the outcome of cats and dogs with traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. In the studies that assessed the time between trauma or hospital admission and surgical repair the timing of herniorrhaphy was not associated with survival to hospital discharge (Gibson et al., 2005; Legallet et al., 2017; and Schmiedt et al., 2003).
In one study assessing surgical repair of chronic diaphragmatic hernia, defined as being present for over 2 weeks prior to surgical repair, in-hospital mortality was 7/50 (14%) (Minihan et al., 2004). Another study found no difference in mortality in cats undergoing surgical repair within 24 hours, 1–7 days or over 7 days since trauma, with overall mortality of 6/34 (17.6%) (Schmiedt et al., 2003). Overall mortality is variable, with the lowest reported rate 3/44 (6.8%) (Ozer et al., 2007). The highest reported mortality rate was 27/53 (50.9%) (Garson et al., 1980); survival in this population was markedly worse that the cases in the remainder of the studies. This may reflect a change in approach to case management and treatment options available since publication. However, another older publication reported a mortality rate similar to more recent studies (Wilson et al., 1971).
The published data are retrospective studies with many clinical variables, with differences in individual disease severity and case management (Besalti et al., 2011; Garson et al., 1980; Gibson et al., 2005; Igna et al., 2014, Legallet et al., 2017; Minihan et al., 2004; Ozer et al., 2007; Schmiedt et al., 2003; Wilson et al., 1971; and Yaygingül et al., 2019). Varied disease severity is to be expected in this condition as it has a traumatic aetiology, and many cases presented with concurrent soft tissue and orthopaedic injuries. Multiple injuries were associated with outcome in two studies (Legallet et al., 2017; and Schmiedt et al., 2003), with an increase in mortality of these patients. Animals with concurrent injuries that underwent herniorrhaphy also had other surgical procedures performed under the same general anaesthesia. Several also had elective procedures performed, such as neutering. Increased anaesthesia time was linked with an increase in mortality (Legallet et al., 2017). In the same study, animals that required oxygen supplementation prior to surgery were less likely to survive. These findings suggest that systemic disease severity is associated with outcome in cats and dogs with traumatic diaphragmatic rupture.
Variables not assessed was the association between number and type of organs herniated into the thorax or the location of diaphragmatic tear and outcome. These were not linked to the PICO question to assess the timing of surgical intervention, therefore were not investigated as part of this review.
In conclusion, in reviewing the available literature, there is no evidence to support that time to surgical intervention is associated with outcome in cats and dogs with traumatic diaphragmatic rupture.
[…]
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
About
Copyright Statement
© All text and images in this publication are copyright protected and cannot be reproduced or copied in any way.Related Content
Readers also viewed these publications
Subscribe
Veterinary Evidence is an online, open access, peer-reviewed journal owned and published by RCVS Knowledge. If you would like to receive updates on recent publications, you can register here. If you would like to submit an manuscript for publication in the Veterinary Evidence journal, you can consult the Guidelines for Authors.
Comments (0)
Ask the author
0 comments