Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Stallion Sperm Recovery Rate After Centrifugation and Removal of the Supernatant Using Different Methods
V.C.L. Gomes, L.M.J. Miller, J...
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Read
A reduction in sperm loss during centrifugation would yield an increase in viable sperm for cryopreservation or insemination. It was hypothesized that the method used to remove the supernatant after centrifugation would have an effect on sperm recovery rate. Some methods may reduce processing time and, therefore, sperm loss in the supernatant due to swim up of viable sperm from the pellet. Two experiments were conducted to test this hypothesis. In each experiment, two ejaculates were collected from each of three stallions, totaling six ejaculates per experiment. Semen was extended to 25×106sperm/mL with a milk based semen extender, divided into three 40 mL aliquots, and centrifuged for 10 min at 900 × g in 50 mL conical centrifugation tubes. Then, 37 mL of supernatant was removed using one of three methods. In Exp. 1, the supernatant was removed with a 1.5 mL glass Pasteur pipette attached to a latex bulb (GPP), a 3 mL plastic transfer pipette (PTP), or vacuum suction (VS). Since the GPP yielded the best recovery rate in the first experiment, this method was subsequently compared with others in the second experiment. In Exp. 2, the supernatant was removed with the GPP, a 10 mL pipette attached to a manual pipettor (10P), or a combination of the 10P up to the 10 mL mark of the centrifugation tube and GPP thereafter (10PGPP). [...]
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Comments (0)
Ask the author
0 comments