Skip to main content
menu sluit menu
Home Home
Login
Main navigation
  • Library
  • Calendar
  • e-Learning
  • News
    • Veterinary News In this section you find veterinary news
    • Recent Additions All content that was recently added to the IVIS library
  • Get involved
    • Donate Support IVIS, make a donation today
    • Media kit Promote your e-learning & events on IVIS
    • Add your e-learning & events to the IVIS calendar
    • Publish on IVIS Publish your work with us
  • About
    • Mission Our Mission Statement
    • What we do More info about IVIS and what we do
    • Who we are More info about the IVIS team
    • Authors See list of all IVIS authors and editors
  • Contact
User tools menu
User tools menu
Main navigation
  • Library
  • Calendar
  • e-Learning
  • News
    • Veterinary News In this section you find veterinary news
    • Recent Additions All content that was recently added to the IVIS library
  • Get involved
    • Donate Support IVIS, make a donation today
    • Media kit Promote your e-learning & events on IVIS
    • Add your e-learning & events to the IVIS calendar
    • Publish on IVIS Publish your work with us
  • About
    • Mission Our Mission Statement
    • What we do More info about IVIS and what we do
    • Who we are More info about the IVIS team
    • Authors See list of all IVIS authors and editors
  • Contact
Follow IVIS
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Support IVIS

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Library
  3. Recent Advances in Equine Reproduction
  4. Hysteroscopic and Low-dose Insemination Techniques in the Horse
Recent Advances in Equine Reproduction - Ball B.A.
Back to Table of Contents
Add to My Library
Close
Would you like to add this to your library?

Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website

  • Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
  • Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
  • Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
  • Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
  • Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Sign in Register
Comments
Print this article
Share:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail
  • Twitter

Hysteroscopic and Low-dose Insemination Techniques in the Horse

Author(s):
Ball B.A.
In: Recent Advances in Equine Reproduction by Ball B.
Updated:
DEC 20, 2004
Languages:
  • EN
  • ES
Back to Table of Contents
Add to My Library
Close
Would you like to add this to your library?

Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website

  • Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
  • Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
  • Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
  • Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
  • Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Sign in Register
Print this article
SHARE:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail
  • Twitter
    Read

    Introduction

    The number of equine sperm used for artificial insemination (AI) in the mare was largely established by research conducted at Colorado State University in the 1970s [1-3]. The minimum insemination dose of 500 million progressively motile spermatozoa (PMS) established in these studies has been widely used as an industry standard. Clinical observations suggest that this insemination dose provides a conservative and effective insemination dose for the mare. Other authors have suggested that individual stallions may require fewer sperm for maximal fertility (100 to 250 million PMS) and that adjustment for the percentage of morphologically normal sperm may be desirable [4,5].

    A more widespread application of cryopreserved equine semen and the application of techniques for sex-sorted sperm in the horse have provided considerable incentive to reduce the number of spermatozoa used per insemination in order to maximize the efficiency of these techniques. Two reports in 1998 provided information that suggested that deposition of relatively low numbers of spermatozoa at the uterotubal papilla via endoscopically guided techniques could result in pregnancy in mares [6,7] (Table 1). Although pregnancy rates were low (22 to 30%) after insemination of 1 to 3.8 million PMS, these studies demonstrated the feasibility of dramatically lowering the number of sperm inseminated by direct deposition of sperm at the uterotubal junction (UTJ) via hysteroscopically guided techniques.

    Subsequent to these reports, a number of studies have examined low-dose insemination techniques in the mare based upon both hysteroscopic and deep intrauterine techniques for deposition of fresh, chilled, cryopreserved as well as sex-sorted sperm (Table 1).

    Sperm Reservoir Formation

    Although relatively large numbers of sperm are deposited into the uterus at the time of natural service (109) or AI (108), relatively few (102 - 103) sperm reach the site of fertilization at the ampullar-isthmic junction of the oviduct of mares [8-11]. The progression of sperm through the female reproductive tract is associated with a marked reduction in the number of sperm as well as a marked improvement in the percentage of motile, morphologically normal sperm [8,12,13]. The uterotubal junction as well as the initial portion of the oviductal isthmus is believed to play an important role in the selection of sperm as well as in the formation of an effective sperm reservoir [8,14]. Sequestration of sperm within this site occurs rapidly after mating or insemination such that sperm are effectively isolated from the uterine environment within approximately 4 hours after insemination [15,16].

    Formation of an effective sperm reservoir within the initial portion of the isthmic oviduct appears to depend upon a cell-cell adhesion between sperm and oviductal epithelial cells that is capable of maintaining the fertile life of equine sperm for several days during estrus in mares [8]. Sperm that are adherent to the oviductal epithelium are effectively blocked from undergoing the pre-fertilization change of capacitation which acts to maintain a viable, intact population of sperm to participate in ovulation at the time of ovulation. The adhesion of sperm to oviductal epithelium maintains low intracellular calcium in adherent sperm [17]. At the time of ovulation, sperm are released from this reservoir and undergo the prefertilization changes necessary for successful binding of the zona pellucida and fertilization.

    Low-Dose Insemination - Results to Date

    A relatively large number of reports have examined various aspects of reduced-dose insemination in the mare over the past 5 years (summary - Table 1). In the first large trial that compared the effect of sperm number on subsequent pregnancy rates in mares after hysteroscopic insemination at the UTJ, Morris et al., [18], demonstrated that as insemination doses of 10, 5, or 1 x 106 motile sperm deposited at the UTJ (Fig 1a, Fig 1b) ipsilateral to ovulation resulted in pregnancy rates of 60 - 75% and that insemination doses as small as 1,000 motile sperm achieved pregnancy (1/10 mares inseminated).

    Hysteroscopic views of the uterotubal junction (UTJ) of mares during estrus. Arrows indicate the location of the UTJ.
    Figure 1a. Hysteroscopic views of the uterotubal junction (UTJ) of mares during estrus. Arrows indicate the location of the UTJ.

    Hysteroscopic views of the uterotubal junction (UTJ) of mares during estrus. Arrows indicate the location of the UTJ.
    Figure 1b. Hysteroscopic views of the uterotubal junction (UTJ) of mares during estrus. Arrows indicate the location of the UTJ.

    Sperm Preparation Techniques

    A variety of extenders and media have been used for sperm preparation prior to endoscopic insemination. Preparation of sperm prior to insemination may influence subsequent pregnancy rates because of factors such as the removal of seminal plasma as well as the potential influence of some extender components on the ability of sperm to adhere to the oviductal epithelium. We have previously shown that seminal plasma in low dilutions (1:100) may block the ability of equine sperm to bind oviductal epithelium in in vitro studies (Dobrinski and Ball, unpublished data). Normally transit through the female reproductive tract results in removal of much of the seminal plasma; however, with deposition of sperm near the UTJ, there may be less opportunity for seminal plasma proteins to be removed prior to sperm reservoir formation. Likewise, inclusion of extenders in sperm suspensions used for GIFT procedures in the horse appears to reduce resultant fertilization rates [19]. However, there are no controlled studies available to address the potential roles of either extender components or seminal plasma on fertility achieved after low-dose insemination.

    Centrifugation across density gradients, such as Percoll, has been used to remove seminal plasma, and extender components as well as to enrich the population of motile sperm used for low-dose insemination via hysteroscopy [18]. In other reports, more practical methods for sperm preparation that do not result in complete removal of extender components or seminal plasma have achieved acceptable pregnancy rates. In studies with frozen-thawed equine sperm, direct deposition of cryopreserved sperm after thawing without removal of freezing extenders has also resulted in acceptable pregnancy rates.

    Media used for sperm suspension prior to insemination include a variety of semen extenders, including skim-milk or skim-milk/egg yolk, cryopreservation media as well as a number of sperm media such as Tyrode’s medium (TALP). Again, there are no reports of critical comparison among these media and acceptable pregnancy rates have been achieved using both routine semen extenders, cryopreservation extenders (frozen semen) as well as TALP. The use of media such as TALP requires careful sperm handling conditions as sperm suspended in these media appear to be more susceptible to cold shock.

    Insemination volume

    The volume of inseminate deposited at the UTJ by hysteroscopy typically varies between 20 to 200 ul. When frozen-thawed sperm are inseminated directly, a volume of 250 to 500 ul (corresponding to a single 0.25- or 0.5-ml straw) is typically inseminated.

    Hysteroscopy vs. Deep Intrauterine Insemination

    Although the initial reports dealing with low-dose insemination techniques in the mare were based upon endoscopically-guided procedures to deposit the sperm on the UTJ, other workers have used a transrectally guided technique to direct a flexible insemination catheter to the tip of the uterine horn ipsilateral to the preovulatory follicle. In a report by Brinsko et al., [18,20], pregnancy rates after insemination with 5 x 106 motile sperm at the tip of the uterine horn by either pipette or endoscopic procedures were similar (Table 1). In other reports in which similar numbers of sperm were deposited at the horn tip by pipette, pregnancy rates varied between 35 - 50% (Table 1). These studies suggest that insemination doses of approximately 5x106 motile sperm with deep-intrauterine techniques can achieve acceptable pregnancy rates without the need for endoscopic procedures.

    Site of Insemination

    Although most of the effort with low-dose insemination has been directed toward deposition of sperm on or near the UTJ, at least one study indicates that low dose insemination into the uterine body may also result in acceptable fertility. Morris et al., [21], compared fertility after insemination of 14x106 motile, frozen-thawed sperm into the uterine body by pipette or at the UTJ via endoscopy. Pregnancy rates achieved with the two techniques were similar (Table 1). Pregnancy rates were significantly lower when 3x106 motile, frozen-thawed sperm were deposited via endoscopy into the uterine body compared to deposition at the UTJ. There are likely important stallion effects related to the minimal number of sperm needed to achieve acceptable fertility with these techniques; nonetheless, the ability to achieve reasonable fertility rates after deposition of 14 million motile sperm into the uterine body offers intriguing possibilities to improve the efficiency of frozen-thawed equine semen.

    Results with Subfertile Stallions

    Anecdotal reports indicate that low-dose, hysteroscopic insemination procedures have been successful in improving fertility of stallions with low sperm numbers in the ejaculate. Experience at the University of California, Davis (UC-Davis) has not yielded success in managing stallions with oligospermia which included poor sperm morphology.

    The UTJ represents the ostium of the equine oviduct as it projects into the uterine lumen at the tip of the uterine horn. The morphology of the UTJ varies somewhat from mare to mare but typically is observed as a small papillae that projects approximately 3 to 5 mm into the uterine lumen. The lumen of the oviduct at this point is extremely small (size ~ 2 French [7]) and provides an extremely effective barrier between the uterus and oviduct. Initially at UC-Davis, low-dose insemination was attempted by cannulation of the initial portion of the oviduct prior to deposition of the inseminate. This was quickly abandoned due to the difficulty in cannulation of the oviduct and the insemination was conducted by depositing the inseminate onto the uterine surface of the UTJ.

    Other investigators have attempted to improve sperm transit into the oviduct by local administration of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Prostaglandin E2 induces relaxation of the circular smooth muscle of the oviduct and acts to facilitate embryo transport into the uterus. Topical pretreatment with PGE2 (250 ug) increased pregnancy rates in mares bred with 25x106 sperm (13/18 vs 7/16) into either the uterine horn or uterine body [22]. In a subsequent study in which insemination was conducted via endoscopy, there was no positive effect of pretreatment with PGE2 compared to controls [20].

    Technique - Hysteroscopic Insemination

    Clearly, appropriate selection of candidate mares for low-dose insemination as well as stallion fertility will influence the success of this procedure. Young, fertile mares without prior history of post-breeding endometritis are optimal candidates. Older mares with poor uterine clearance will be less desirable candidates and are more likely to have intrauterine fluid accumulation after hysteroscopic insemination. In reported studies the incidence of intrauterine fluid accumulation varies. In early reports, as many as 60% (6/10) of mares had intrauterine fluid accumulation after the procedure [6]; however, later reports indicate an incidence of 1% intrauterine fluid accumulation after endoscopic insemination [23].

    Equipment

    The use of a 1.6 M videoendoscope with an operating channel facilitates visualization of the UTJ in most mares. Shorter endoscopes may be used; however, endoscope length may limit easy access to the operating channel and endoscope controls in larger mares. Care of the operating channel of the endoscope is important to assure that no debris remains in the channel after the procedure and to assure that all of the chemical disinfectant used in processing the endoscope is removed. The small volumes of inseminate used in this procedure are extremely susceptible to contaminants remaining in the biopsy channel of the endoscope.

    Typically a double-lumen catheter is used for the insemination procedure. The double-lumen helps prevent contamination of the inseminate during passage through the endoscope biopsy channel [6]. The catheter length should be a minimum of 20 cm longer than the biopsy channel in order to provide adequate working length for insemination [1]. A minimum of three personnel are typically needed to complete the procedure.

    Mare Preparation

    Typically, low-dose insemination is conducted following ovulation induction with either hCG or deslorelin acetate (Ovuplant®) administration. Intervals of 24 to 30 hours between administration of hCG and insemination are most often used (Table 1) with slightly longer intervals being more useful after administration of Ovuplant®.

    Optimally, for endoscopic insemination mares should be restrained in stocks. Depending upon the mare’s temperament, sedation (detomidine / butorphanol) may be required. The mare’s rectum should be evacuated, and the location of the preovulatory follicle should be confirmed. Careful preparation of the vulva and perineum for the vaginal procedure should be performed.

    Two methods of introduction of the endoscope into the uterus may be used. In the standard hysteroscopic approach, the endoscope is introduced through the cervix, the uterus is insufflated and the endoscope is directed visually up the uterine horn ipsilateral to the preovulatory follicle. Alternatively, the endoscope can be introduced through the cervix and guided by manipulation per rectum up the uterine horn prior to insufflation. Using the first method, it is important to confirm location of the endoscope ipsilateral to the preovulatory follicle because under visual guidance, it is easy to become disoriented as to left versus right uterine horns. Once the UTJ is identified, the insemination catheter should be passed through the biopsy channel and the inseminate deposited directly onto the UTJ (Fig 2 & Fig 3). No attempt is made to cannulate the oviduct during this process. Some authors advocate the introduction of air "bubbles" during deposition of the inseminate in order to maintain a greater contact of the inseminate in the region of the UTJ by surface tension. After insemination is complete, the air that was introduced during the procedure should be removed by suction as the endoscope is removed from the uterus.

    Hysteroscopic view of the UTF and insemination catheter prior to insemination.
    Figure 2. Hysteroscopic view of the UTF and insemination catheter prior to insemination.

    Hysteroscopic view of the UTJ and insemination catheter after insemination
    Figure 3. Hysteroscopic view of the UTJ and insemination catheter after insemination.

    The low number of sperm as well as the small volume of the inseminate require more careful handling and loading sperm for this procedure. This is particularly true if cryopreserved sperm are used as these cells are much more susceptible to cold shock and the small volumes used make heat transfer and thermal shock more likely. Prior to the insemination, catheters and lab-ware used for semen handling should be prewarmed to body temperature. Once the endoscope is in place and the UTJ is identified, the inseminate should be drawn into the distal end of the insemination catheter by aspirating it carefully much as an embryo would be aspirated into a transfer pipette. Insemination should be accomplished rapidly after the catheter is loaded.

    Deep Intrauterine Insemination Techniques

    Mare preparation would be similar to that used for endoscopic insemination although the need for sedation would be less common in this procedure. Again, palpation per rectum should confirm the location of the ipsilateral follicle and evacuate feces from the rectum. After preparation for the vaginal procedure, insemination is conducted by passing the insemination catheter through the cervix. After the catheter is introduced into the cervix, the catheter is guided per rectum to the tip of the uterine horn ipsilateral to the preovulatory follicle. Entry into the uterine horn can be facilitated by grasping the base of the contralateral uterine horn and applying caudal traction. This maneuver tends to straighten the opposite uterine horn and facilitate passage of the catheter to the tip of the horn.

    Our program prefers the insemination catheter from Minitube [2]. This catheter allows the introduction of a 0.5-ml straw for insemination and also allows the use of multiple 0.5-ml straws if needed without withdrawing the catheter (requires two operators to accomplish this). This catheter in the longer length (65 cm) has adequate flexibility for deep intrauterine insemination.

    Table 1. Summary of current literature regarding low-dose and hysteroscopic insemination in the mare.

    Study

    Semen Type

    Sperm Number

    AI Location/Method

    AI Timing

    AI No.

    Pregnancy Rate

    [6]

    Fresh

    3.8x106 PM

    UTJ endoscope

    24 h post hCG

    1

    3/10

    [7]

    Fresh

    10x106 PMMN

    UTJ endoscope

    hCG at time of insemination

    1

    0/11

    10x106 PMMN

    2/9

    [24]

    Fresh

    500x106 PM

    UT body pipette

    34 or 40 h post Ovuplant® (deslorelin acetate)

    1

    18/20

    25x106 PM

    Horn tip pipette

    12/21

    5x106 PM

    7/20

    Sexed, Fresh

    25x106 live

    34 h post Ovuplant® (deslorelin acetate)

    3/10 (SMG ext)

    25x106 live

    5/10 (EY ext)

    [18]

    Fresh

    10x106motile

    UTJ endoscope

    32 h post hCG

    1

    6/10

    5x106

    6/8

    1x106

    16/25

    0.5x106

    4/14

    0.1x106

    3/11

    0.001x106

    1/10

    [22]

    Fresh

    25x106

    UT body pipette

    24 h post hCG

    1

    14/30

    UT horn pipette

    14/32

    [26]

    Frozen

    50x106

    Horn tip pipette

    Pre-OV

    1

    0/10

    UT body pipette

    2/10

    150x106

    Horn tip pipette

    Pre & Post-OV

    2

    4/10

    UT body pipette

    5/10

    400x106

    UT body pipette

    5/10

    800x106

    UT body pipette

    Post-OV

     

    3/10

    [27]

    Frozen

    10x106 motile

    UTJ endoscope

    Post-OV

    1

    4/12

    4/12 (Percoll)

    4400x106 motile

    UT body pipette

    0/12

    [28]

    Frozen

    800x106

    UT body pipette

    Post-OV

    1

    12/20

    400x106

    24 & 40 hr post hCG

    2

    11/20

    200x106

    24 & 40 hr post hCG (Ovuplant?)

    10/20

    200x106

    Horn tip Pipette

    4/20

    [29]

    Fresh

    5x106 motile

    UTJ endoscope

    6 h post hCG

    1

    4/10

    Fresh, sorted

    6/16

    Frozen

    30 h post hCG

    6/16

    Frozen, sorted

    2/15

    [30]

    Fresh

    5x106

    UTJ endoscope

    At time of hCG

    1

    5/10

    UT bodypipette

    0/10

    Fresh, sorted

    UTJ endoscope

    5/20

    [31]

    Fresh, cooled

    500x106 PM

    UT body pipette

    12 & 24 h post hCG

    2

    4/11

    Frozen

    50x106 PM

    Horn tip pipette

    7/11

    [32]

    Fresh 15ºC sorted

    20x106

    UTJ endoscope

    30 h post hCG

    1

    18/25

    Fresh 5ºC Sorted

    UTJ endoscope

    12/22

    Fresh 5ºC Sorted

    Horn tip pipette

    9/24

    [21]

    Frozen

    14x106PM

    UT body pipette

    30 - 32 h post hCG

    1

    8/12

    14x106 PM

    UTJ endoscope

    9/14

    3x106 PM

    UTJ endoscope

    16/34

    UT body endoscope

    2/14

    Contralateral UTJ - endoscope

    1/12

    [27]

    Frozen

    50 - 75 x106

    UTJ endoscope

    6 hr Post-OV

    1

    95/166

    UTJ = uterotubal junction; PM = progressively motile; PMMN = progressively motile, morphologically normal; sorted = sex-sorted sperm; Percoll = Percoll separated; Post-OV = post-ovulation; pre-OV = pre-ovulation

    Back to Table of Contents
    Add to My Library
    Close
    Would you like to add this to your library?

    Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website

    • Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
    • Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
    • Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
    • Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
    • Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
    Sign in Register
    Print this article
    References

    1. Demick DS, Voss JL, Pickett BW. Effect of cooling, storage, glycerolization and spermatozoal numbers on equine fertility. J Anim Sci 1976; 43:633-637.

    2. Householder DD, Pickett BW, Voss JL, et al. Effect of extender, number of spermatozoa and hcg on equine fertility. J Equine Vet Sci 1981; 1:9-13.

    3. Pickett BW, Voss JL. The effect of semen extenders and sperm number on mare fertility. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1975; 23:95-98.

    ...
    Show all
    Comments (0)

    Ask the author

    0 comments
    Submit
    Close
    Would to like to further discuss this item?

    Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website

    • Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
    • Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
    • Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
    • Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
    • Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
    Sign in Register
    About

    How to reference this publication (Harvard system)?

    Ball, B. (2004) “Hysteroscopic and Low-dose Insemination Techniques in the Horse”, Recent Advances in Equine Reproduction. Available at: https://www.ivis.org/library/recent-advances-equine-reproduction/hysteroscopic-and-low-dose-insemination-techniques (Accessed: 21 March 2023).

    Affiliation of the authors at the time of publication

    Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.

    Author(s)

    • Barry Ball

      Ball B.A.

      Professor and Clay Chair in Equine Reproduction
      DVM PhD Dipl ACT
      Department of Veterinary Science, Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky
      Read more about this author

    Copyright Statement

    © All text and images in this publication are copyright protected and cannot be reproduced or copied in any way.
    Related Content

    Readers also viewed these publications

    • Journal Issue

      Veterinary Evidence - Vol 8 N°1, Jan-Mar 2023

      In: Veterinary Evidence
      MAR 07, 2023
    • Proceeding

      AVEF - Conférence Annuelle - Reims, 2022

      By: Association des Vétérinaires Équins Français
      MAR 03, 2023
    • Proceeding

      EEHNC - Virtual Congress - 2021

      By: European Equine Health and Nutrition Congress
      FEB 09, 2023
    • Proceeding

      SFT - Theriogenology Annual Conference - Bellevue, 2022

      By: Society for Theriogenology
      JAN 10, 2023
    • Proceeding

      ACVIM & ECEIM - Consensus Statements

      By: American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine
      NOV 11, 2022
    • Journal Issue

      Veterinary Evidence - Vol 7 N°2, Apr-Jun 2022

      In: Veterinary Evidence
      OCT 07, 2022
    • Journal Issue

      Veterinary Evidence - Vol 7 N°3, Jul-Sep 2022

      In: Veterinary Evidence
      OCT 04, 2022
    • Journal Issue

      Veterinary Practice Management Articles - Veterinary Focus

      In: Veterinary Focus
      AUG 05, 2022
    • Chapter

      Nutrition

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      JUL 09, 2022
    • Chapter

      Pharmacology and Therapeutics

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      JUL 03, 2022
    • Chapter

      Sedation, Anaesthesia and Analgesia

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      JUN 05, 2022
    • Chapter

      The Geriatric Donkey

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      MAY 20, 2022
    • Chapter

      Euthanasia and the Post-Mortem Examination

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      MAY 20, 2022
    • Chapter

      Appendix 7: Example Diets: for the mature, pregnant and lactating donkey

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      MAY 12, 2022
    • Chapter

      Appendix 2: Donkey Weight Estimator

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      MAY 12, 2022
    • Chapter

      Appendix 1: The Clinical Examination

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      MAY 12, 2022
    • Chapter

      Appendix 5: Monitoring your Donkey’s Quality of Life

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      MAY 12, 2022
    • Chapter

      Appendix 6: Professional record of Assessment for Quality of Life

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      MAY 12, 2022
    • Chapter

      Appendix 3: Body Condition Scoring

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      MAY 12, 2022
    • Chapter

      Appendix 4: Parameters: Biochemistry and Haematology

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      MAY 12, 2022
    • Chapter

      The Care of the Foal

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      MAY 12, 2022
    • Chapter

      Approach to the Dull Donkey

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      MAY 07, 2022
    • Chapter

      Parasitology

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      APR 26, 2022
    • Chapter

      The Foot

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      APR 06, 2022
    • Chapter

      Infectious Diseases

      In: The Clinical Companion of the Donkey (2nd Edition)
      MAR 28, 2022
    • Load more
    Buy this book

    Buy this book

    ISBN-10
    Not available yet
    ISBN-13
    Not available yet
    Back To Top
    Become a member of IVIS and get access to all our resources
    Create an account
    Sign in
    Leading the way in providing veterinary information
    About IVIS
    • Mission
    • What we do
    • Who we are
    Need help?
    • Contact
    Follow IVIS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    International Veterinary Information Service (IVIS) is a not-for-profit organization established to provide information to veterinarians, veterinary students, technicians and animal health professionals worldwide using Internet technology.
    Support IVIS
    © 2023 International Veterinary Information Service
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy