Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Differences in cardiovascular physiology between Friesian horses and Warmblood horses
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Read
Introduction
Aortic rupture is more common in Friesians compared to Warmbloods. Differences in arterial wall composition, especially collagen and elastin, determining the tissue strength and elasticity, might predispose this breed to aortic rupture. In this study, arterial wall stiffness (AWS) parameters were compared between Friesians and Warmbloods.
Material and methods
2D and pulsed wave Doppler ultrasound (Vivid IQ, GE Healthcare) was performed in 101 healthy Friesians (mean±SD age 12±6 years, body weight 553±42 kg) and 101 healthy Warmbloods (11±5 years and 556±33 kg) from aorta, common carotid artery and external iliac artery to define local AWS parameters such as distensibility and compliance. Regional aortic AWS was estimated from the aortic to external iliac artery pulse wave velocity (PWVAo-E ). Non-invasive blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded simultaneously.
Results
Mean BP (115±15 mmHg) and pulse pressure (49±9 mmHg) were significantly (p<0.001) higher in Friesians compared to Warmbloods (106±13 mmHg and 44±9 mmHg, respectively) while no significant difference in HR was found (37±5 bpm versus 36±6 bpm; p=0.139). Compared to Warmbloods, Friesians had significantly lower aortic distensibility (2.14x10-3 ±1.01x10 -3 /mmHg versus 2.47x10-3 ±1.01x10 -3 /mmHg; p=0.026) and compliance (1.24x10-1 ±0.56x10 -1 mm/mmHg versus 1.52x10-1 ±0.64x10 -1 mm/mmHg; p=0.002), indicating a stiffer aorta. This could be confirmed by a higher PWV Ao-E (6.52±0.90 m/s versus 5.95±0.94 m/s; p<0.001) in Friesians.
For the common carotid artery, Friesians showed a significantly higher distensibility (1.47x10-3 ±0.65x10-3 /mmHg versus 1.22x10-3 ±0.65x10 -3 /mmHg; p=0.011) and compliance (1.48x10-2 ±0.66x10 -2 mm/mmHg versus 1.29x10-2 ±0.70x10 -2 mm/mmHg; p=0.047) compared to Warmbloods, indicating a more elastic common carotid artery. For the external iliac artery, results were not significantly different.
Conclusion
Results indicate that the AWS differs between Friesians and Warmbloods. Friesians seem to have a stiffer aorta, in combination with a more compliant common carotid artery. These differences might be related to the higher incidence of aortic rupture in Friesians.
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Comments (0)
Ask the author
0 comments