Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Evaluation of a New Laser Beam Wound Camera
L.L. Van Hecke
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Read
Evaluation of a new laser beam wound camera and a digital photoplanimetry based method for wound measurement in horses
Introduction
The goal of this study was to evaluate a new laser beam wound camera and a digital photoplanimetry based method for their accuracy, precision, inter- and intra-operator reliability in measuring the dimensions of equine wounds. Materials and methods A total of 41 wounds were created on equine cadavers, and the area, circumference, maximum depth and volume of each wound was measured four times with both techniques by two operators. A silicon cast was made of each wound and served as ‘golden standard’ to measure the wound dimensions. Results and conclusions The digital photoplanimetry based method had a higher accuracy (mean relative bias (RB) of -10.2% 33.0 vs. -44.1% 26.1 with p < 0.01) and precision (standard error of measurement (SEM) 10.63 vs 17.06) in determining the wound volume, whereas the laser beam camera had a higher accuracy in determining the wound area (mean RB – 8.6% 6.3 vs -12.4% 8.3 with p < 0.01) and maximum depth (mean RB -7.4% 39.5 vs 53.5% 52.9 with p < 0.01) and better precision in determining the area (SEM 6.4 vs 10.53) and circumference (SEM 1.83 vs 2.43). […]
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
About
Copyright Statement
© All text and images in this publication are copyright protected and cannot be reproduced or copied in any way.Related Content
Readers also viewed these publications
No related publications found.
Comments (0)
Ask the author
0 comments