Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Agreement Among Veterinarians for Subjective Evaluation of Lameness in Horses.
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Read
1. Introduction
In 1997, lack of agreement between equine clinicians for scoring of mild lameness was reported. Other studies have concluded similarly that subjective scoring of lameness in horses was only "moderately reliable" or "just within acceptable limits". However, in these previous studies, subjective evaluations were performed by viewing videotapes of small numbers of horses.
2. Materials and Methods
One hundred thirty-one horses of varying grades of lameness were simultaneously evaluated by an average of 3.2 equine veterinarians. Evaluators scored the lameness using two methods: picking which limbs indicated lameness by observing the horse trot up and down in a straight line and grading each limb on the AAEP scale (0 - 5) after full lameness evaluation, including flexion tests and lunging in circles. Inter-rater reliability (agreement) was determined by calculation of Fleiss’ kappa (κ). The 95% confidence interval for AAEP lameness score was estimated.
3. Results
Practitioners agreed on the existence of lameness in the forelimbs and hindlimbs ~25% and 15% above chance, respectively. There was little difference in strength of agreement between evaluation methods. The 95% confidence interval for a single AAEP lameness score was ~1.5 grades.
4. Discussion
Agreement between experienced veterinarians performing subjective lameness evaluations is acceptable but low. Agreement for the existence of hindlimb lameness was less than that for forelimb lameness.
Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website
- Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
- Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
- Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
- Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
- Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Comments (0)
Ask the author
0 comments