Skip to main content
menu sluit menu
Home Home
Login
Main navigation
  • Library
  • Calendar
  • e-Learning
  • News
    • Veterinary News In this section you find veterinary news
    • Recent Additions All content that was recently added to the IVIS library
  • Get involved
    • Donate Support IVIS, make a donation today
    • Media kit Promote your e-learning & events on IVIS
    • Add your e-learning & events to the IVIS calendar
    • Publish on IVIS Publish your work with us
  • About
    • Mission Our Mission Statement
    • What we do More info about IVIS and what we do
    • Who we are More info about the IVIS team
    • Authors See list of all IVIS authors and editors
  • Contact
User tools menu
User tools menu
Main navigation
  • Library
  • Calendar
  • e-Learning
  • News
    • Veterinary News In this section you find veterinary news
    • Recent Additions All content that was recently added to the IVIS library
  • Get involved
    • Donate Support IVIS, make a donation today
    • Media kit Promote your e-learning & events on IVIS
    • Add your e-learning & events to the IVIS calendar
    • Publish on IVIS Publish your work with us
  • About
    • Mission Our Mission Statement
    • What we do More info about IVIS and what we do
    • Who we are More info about the IVIS team
    • Authors See list of all IVIS authors and editors
  • Contact
Follow IVIS
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Support IVIS

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Library
  3. American Association of Equine Practitioners
  4. AAEP Annual Convention - Orlando, 2007
  5. Review of Surgical Treatment of Triple Level Cervical Cord Compression (12 Cases)
AAEP Annual Convention Orlando 2007
Back to Table of Contents
Add to My Library
Close
Would you like to add this to your library?

Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website

  • Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
  • Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
  • Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
  • Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
  • Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Sign in Register
Comments
Share:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail
  • Twitter

Review of Surgical Treatment of Triple Level Cervical Cord Compression (12 Cases)

Author(s):
Grant B.,
Huggons N.,
Bagby G.W.,
Reed S.M. and
Robertson J.T.
In: AAEP Annual Convention - Orlando, 2007 by American Association of Equine Practitioners
Updated:
DEC 05, 2007
Languages:
  • EN
Back to Table of Contents
Add to My Library
Close
Would you like to add this to your library?

Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website

  • Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
  • Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
  • Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
  • Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
  • Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
Sign in Register
SHARE:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail
  • Twitter
    Read

    Twelve horses with triple-level cervical spinal-cord compression that had undergone triple-level anterior interbody fusion were split into three treatment groups based on the implant used for the spinal-fusion surgery. The groups consisted of the heterologus bone graft (group 1), the stainless-steel basket (SSB, also known as the Bagby Basket; group 2), and the Kerf Cleaning Cylinder (also known as the Seattle Slew implant; group 3). All patients had pre-operative neurological and myelographic examinations performed by veterinarians. The owners were contacted to determine long-term outcome and general use of each patient. All survivors (92%) improved at least one neurological grade, and 88% improved two neurological grades or more. All horses had decreased range of lateral cervical motion post-operatively.

    1. Introduction

    The surgical treatment of equine cervical spinalcord compression was first described in 1979 [1]. Since that time, there have been reports on the improvements in diagnostic procedures [2,3], surgical technique [4,5], and results [6,7]. A conservative estimate has been made that over 1000 horses have undergone this procedure collectively. The majority of patients have had treatment for either single- or double-level spinal cord compression at C3/C4, C4/C5, and C5/C6. The next most common location is the stenotic lesions at C6/C7. Although a number of ataxic patients have had myelograms that show triple level spinal cord compression, there has only been four reports on successful outcomes from the surgical treatment of triple level spinal cord compression [7-9]. There is currently a reference that does not recommend the procedure based on the results of two cases [10]. The purpose of this review is to provide the clinical signalment and outcomes of 12 horses to allow veterinarians to make an informed decision on their recommendations concerning triple level spinal cord compression.

    2. Materials and Methods

    All patients had pre-operative neurological examinations, cervical radiographs, and myelograms. Neurological examination revealed moderate to marked ataxia consistent with cervical spinal cord compression. One author (BG) assessed the post operative neurological grade in all cases except patient 2 (deceased), patient 6, and patient 7 (both assessed by SMR and JTR). The myelograms all showed compression of the dorsal and ventral dye columns in the flexed position at C3/C4, C4/C5, and C5/C6, except for patients 5 and 11. Patient 5 had compression of both dye columns at C3/C4 and C5/ C6, but C4/C5 was fused inadvertently with C3/C4. When the post-operative radiographs showed the misplacement, a second surgery was performed to fuse C5/C6. Patient 11 showed compression at C3/ C4, C4/C5, and C6/C7.

    3. Surgical Technique

    All horses were pre-medicated with procaine penicillin [a] (22,000 IU/kg, IM), gentamicin [b] (6.6 mg/kg, IV), and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (phenylbutazone [c], 4.4 mg/kg, IV or flunixin meglumine [d], 1.1 mg/kg, IV). The surgical procedure was usually performed at least 4 days after the myelogram. The surgical techniques used for group 1 [1], group 2 [4], and group 3 [5,6,8] have previously been described. When performing triple level fusions, the authors’ preference is to start at the most anterior level and proceed caudally unless one level is significantly more compressed than the others. In that case, the most severe level is the first level fused, because anesthetic problems may abort the completion of all three levels. After each implant and bone graft is in place, the longus colli muscle is reapposed using a double level closure with a horizontal mattress pattern followed by oversewing with a simple continuous layer. This step reduces any post-operative hematoma formation. The procedure is then repeated on the next level.

    Patients 1 and 2 had a frozen iliac allograft, patients 3 - 7 had the original stainless-steel basket (SSB), and patients 8 - 12 had a Kerf Cleaning Cylinder (KCC, also known as the Seattle Slew implant). Patient 9 had a pediatric-sized, 16-mm KCC. The procedure was performed on all patients by the one author (BG) except patients 2, 6, and 7 and the C6/C7 level on patient 10 (performed by SMR and JTR). Patients 6 and 7 were operated on at The Ohio State University. The operating time for all surgeries lasted between 90 and 120 min (except patient #2).

    All patients received post-operative antibiotics for 3 days and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories for ≥2 wk. Post-operative radiographs were obtained 3 - 5 days after surgery. Patients were confined to stalls for 60 days; at that time, the radiographs were repeated, and a neurological exam was performed to determine if exercise could be safely increased. At 90 days, all patients (except patient 2) could be placed into small paddocks. Significant neurological improvement in the patients was not noted until 120 days after surgery.

    Four-year post-operative myelogram of patient 8 showing the normal myelogram of all three fused areas (A) and the joints anterior (B) and posterior (C) to the fusions.
    Figure 1. Four-year post-operative myelogram of patient 8 showing the normal myelogram of all three fused areas (A) and the joints anterior (B) and posterior (C) to the fusions.

    4. Results

    All patients were able to recover from surgery. Only patient 2 had a major problem with primary healing, and this horse was later euthanized because of incisional dehiscence. The surviving patients (92%) improved at least one neurological grade, and 75% improved more than two neurological grades 1 yr after surgery. Of the 4 survivors that were intended to be racehorses, 2 horses were able to train, race, and win (patient 5 won a stake race). Patient 4 died in a paddock accident from an unknown cause 2 yr after surgery before it was to be placed into training. Of the survivors intended to be ridden as pleasure or show animals, three horses have been ridden or shown, and two horses are entering training. There was no statistical difference noted with the neurological improvement or the clinical outcome between the three treatment groups.

    One patient had a myelogram performed 4 yr after surgery (Fig. 1; Table 1), and no compression was noted at the operative sites or the articulations anterior and posterior to the fusions.

    Table 1. Signalment, Neurological Assessment, Outcome, and Complications of 12 Patients Having Triple Level Cervical Interbody Fusions.

    Patient Number

    Breed

    Age at Time of Surgery (yr)

    Sex

    Surgical Site (Cervical Vertebrae)

    Type of Implant and Group Number

    Pre-operative Neurologic Grade

    Post-operative Neurologic Grade

    Use After Surgery

    Complications

    1

    Tb

    1

    M

    3/4, 4/5, 5/6

    Frozen allograft (1)

    3/5

    <1

    Raced, won, sire

    Stiff neck

    2

    Tb

    1

    M

    3/4, 4/5, 5/6

    Frozen allograft (1)

    3/5

    Euthanized

    Deceased

    Complete dehiscence

    3

    Tb

    1

    M

    3/4, 4/5, 5/6

    SSB (2)

    3/5

    1/5

    Sire

    Pain in cervical area for 1 yr

    4

    QH

    1

    M

    (c)

    3/4, 4/5, 5/6

    SSB (2)

    3/5

    1/5

    Pasture

    Euthanized 2 yr after surgery

    5

    QH

    1

    M

    (c)

    3/4, 4/5, 5/6

    SSB (2)

    3/5

    1/5

    Raced and won a stake

    Stiff neck

    6

    ASB

    1

    M

    3/4, 4/5, 5/6

    SSB (2)

    3/5

    2/5

    Teaser stallion for 5 years

    Unable to be an athlete

    7

    Tb

    1

    M

    (c)

    3/4, 4/5, 6/7

    SSB (2)

    3/5

    2/5

    Trained did not race

    Had two sites operated and after 1 yr had the third site

    8

    TW

    4

    M

    (c)

    3/4, 4/5, 5/6

    Seattle Slew (3)

    3/5

    1/5

    Pleasure

    Stiff neck

    9

    MFT

    1

    M

    (c)

    3/4, 4/5, 5/6

    Seattle Slew (small) (3)

    3/5

    1/5

    Entering show training

    Stiff neck

    Mild deficits with sharp turns

    10

    WB

    2

    M

    (c)

    3/4, 4/5, 5/6

    Seattle Slew (3)

    3/5

    1/5

    Pleasure

    Stiff neck

    11

    Arab

    6

    M

    (c)

    3/4, 4/5, 5/6

    Seattle Slew (3)

    3/5

    1/5

    Pleasure

    Occasional stumbling at walk

    12

    Tb

    8

    M

    (c)

    3/4, 4/5, 6/7

    Seattle Slew (3)

    2/5

    1/5

    Pleasure

    Stiff neck

    Breed - Tb, Thoroughbred; QH, Quarter horse; ASB, American Saddlebred; TWH, Tennessee walking horse; MFT, Missouri Fox Trotter; WB, warmblood; Sex - M, male; (c), castrated

    Implant - SSB, stainless steel basket.

    Seattle Slew-Kerf Cleaning Cylinder (KCC).

    5. Discussion

    Currently, there are recommendations that ventral interbody fusion be performed only on patients that have spinal cord compression at a maximum of two sites [10]. Horses that do not receive therapy have a poor prognosis because of the continuous damage done to the cervical spinal cord. Insurance adjusters will often comply with a request for humane destruction in such cases. The triple level patients are subject to a life of impaired performance and are most often humanely destroyed. In humans, triple level anterior interbody fusions are not commonly performed with single cages, because the small size of the body of the human vertebra does not permit implantation. Smaller dual Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) cages could be used, but the indications are not common. The condition is most often treated with a combination of laminectomy and external fixators [a]. Equine cervical vertebral anatomy allows for the placement of ventral implants to be positioned surgically at consecutive levels, which allows double and triple level vertebral stabilization at consecutive cervical vertebrae. Our results indicate that clinical improvement is possible. Additionally, the affected patients can live productive and/or competitive lives with no danger to themselves or their handlers, and they do not require daily medications.

    The authors would like to thank the clinicians and staff in providing their professional support at Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas; Moore & Company, Calgary, Alberta; and Chapparal Equine Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.

    Footnotes

    [a] Pen-G, Phoenix Pharmaceutical, St. Joseph, MO 64507.

    [b] GentaFuse, Butler Animal Health Supply, Dublin, OH 43017-7545.

    [c] Phenylbute Injection 20%, Phoenix Pharmaceutical, St. Joseph, MO 64507.

    [d] Prevail, VetOne, Meridian, ID, 83643.

    [e] Bagby GW. Personal communication. 2007.

    Back to Table of Contents
    Add to My Library
    Close
    Would you like to add this to your library?

    Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website

    • Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
    • Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
    • Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
    • Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
    • Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
    Sign in Register
    Comments (0)

    Ask the author

    0 comments
    Submit
    Close
    Would to like to further discuss this item?

    Get access to all handy features included in the IVIS website

    • Get unlimited access to books, proceedings and journals.
    • Get access to a global catalogue of meetings, on-site and online courses, webinars and educational videos.
    • Bookmark your favorite articles in My Library for future reading.
    • Save future meetings and courses in My Calendar and My e-Learning.
    • Ask authors questions and read what others have to say.
    Sign in Register
    About

    How to reference this publication (Harvard system)?

    Grant, B. et al. (2007) “Review of Surgical Treatment of Triple Level Cervical Cord Compression (12 Cases)”, AAEP Annual Convention - Orlando, 2007. Available at: https://www.ivis.org/library/aaep/aaep-annual-convention-orlando-2007/review-of-surgical-treatment-of-triple-level-cervical-cord-compression-12-cases (Accessed: 04 October 2023).

    Author(s)

    • Grant B.

      DVM MS Dipl ACVS
      San Luis Rey Equine Hospital,
      Read more about this author
    • Huggons N.

      DVM
      San Luis Rey Equine Hospital,
      Read more about this author
    • Bagby G.W.

      MD MS
      105 West 8th Avenue, Suite 454,
      Read more about this author
    • Reed Steve

      Reed S.M.

      DVM Dipl ACVIM-LA
      Rood and Riddle Equine Hospital,
      Read more about this author
    • Robertson J.T.

      Associate Professor
      DVM Dipl ACVS
      Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences , College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University
      Read more about this author

    Copyright Statement

    © All text and images in this publication are copyright protected and cannot be reproduced or copied in any way.
    Related Content

    Readers also viewed these publications

    • Journal Issue

      Diagnóstico temprano: la clave frente al BVDv - Albeitar - N°261, Julio/Agosto 2023

      In: Albéitar
      AUG 29, 2023
    • Journal Issue

      Veterinary Evidence - Vol 8 N°3, Jul-Sep 2023

      In: Veterinary Evidence
      AUG 20, 2023
    • Journal Issue

      Veterinary Evidence - Vol 8 N°2, Apr-Jun 2023

      In: Veterinary Evidence
      JUN 26, 2023
    • Proceeding

      BEVA - Annual Congress - Liverpool, 2022

      By: British Equine Veterinary Association
      MAR 20, 2023
    • Journal Issue

      Veterinary Evidence - Vol 8 N°1, Jan-Mar 2023

      In: Veterinary Evidence
      MAR 19, 2023
    • Journal Issue

      Cirugía de urgencias - Argos N°246, Marzo 2023

      In: Argos
      MAR 10, 2023
    • Proceeding

      AVEF - Conférence Annuelle - Reims, 2022

      By: Association des Vétérinaires Équins Français
      MAR 03, 2023
    • Proceeding

      EEHNC - Virtual Congress - 2021

      By: European Equine Health and Nutrition Congress
      FEB 09, 2023
    • Proceeding

      SFT - Theriogenology Annual Conference - Bellevue, 2022

      By: Society for Theriogenology
      JAN 10, 2023
    • Journal Issue

      Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine - Vol. 77(4), Dec. 2022

      In: Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine
      DEC 31, 2022
    • Proceeding

      ACVIM & ECEIM - Consensus Statements

      By: American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine
      NOV 11, 2022
    • Chapter

      Tibia and Tarsus

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      NOV 07, 2022
    • Chapter

      Femur and Stifle Joint

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      OCT 28, 2022
    • Journal Issue

      Medicina felina - Argos Nº241, Septiembre 2022

      In: Argos
      OCT 24, 2022
    • Journal Issue

      Veterinary Evidence - Vol 7 N°2, Apr-Jun 2022

      In: Veterinary Evidence
      OCT 07, 2022
    • Journal Issue

      Veterinary Evidence - Vol 7 N°3, Jul-Sep 2022

      In: Veterinary Evidence
      OCT 04, 2022
    • Chapter

      Scapula and Shoulder Joint

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      SEP 05, 2022
    • Chapter

      Bone Grafts and Implants

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      SEP 03, 2022
    • Chapter

      External Skeletal Fixation

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      AUG 28, 2022
    • Chapter

      Plate-Rod Fixation

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      AUG 18, 2022
    • Chapter

      Fixation with Screws and Bone Plates

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      AUG 15, 2022
    • Chapter

      Interlocking Nailing of Canine and Feline Fractures

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      AUG 11, 2022
    • Chapter

      Fixation with Pins and Wires

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      AUG 07, 2022
    • Journal Issue

      Veterinary Practice Management Articles - Veterinary Focus

      In: Veterinary Focus
      AUG 05, 2022
    • Chapter

      Thoracolumbar and Sacral Spine

      In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (5th Edition)
      AUG 04, 2022
    • Load more
    Provided by:
    AAEP - American Association of Equine Practitioners

    The AAEP represents nearly 9,300 veterinarians and veterinary students in 61 countries who cover a broad range of equine disciplines, breeds and associations. The AAEP is primary resource for education, professional development and ethical standards for its members. The AAEP and its members are recognized as the voice and authority for the health and welfare of the horse. The AAEP conducts regular strategic planning every three to four years in order to establish priorities and set direction for the association over the current planning horizon.  The AAEP is a respected source of information for influencing public policy.  

    Learn more
    Back To Top
    Become a member of IVIS and get access to all our resources
    Create an account
    Sign in
    Leading the way in providing veterinary information
    About IVIS
    • Mission
    • What we do
    • Who we are
    Need help?
    • Contact
    Follow IVIS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    International Veterinary Information Service (IVIS) is a not-for-profit organization established to provide information to veterinarians, veterinary students, technicians and animal health professionals worldwide using Internet technology.
    Support IVIS
    © 2023 International Veterinary Information Service
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy